Conclusions

In applications where digital images must be transmitted over a slow channel and displayed on a reasonably fast computer system, the use of foveation can be of great benefit in reducing transmission times. These benefits can be realized without the aid of an eye-tracking device, although the resultant blur will be noticeable to the observer. Compression ratios of over 80% have been achieved for foveation of large images, and even greater savings could be imagined if the foveation function were allowed to decrease more rapidly than the human visual system. If desired, foveation could be increased until a desired compression ratio is achieved for a given image.

If the blurring due to foveation is not acceptable in a final image, but rapid image recognition is desired, then a fovea-first transmission method might be appropriate. In a medical imaging context, imagine a radiologist looking through hundreds of MRI scans for a patient who has a particular ailment. If each image were foveated with the point of gaze centered on the patient's ailment, then the radiologist could rapidly scroll through many images. If the image currently being rendered does not match the radiologist's search criteria, then he or she could move on before the entire image is transmitted. However, when the radiologist finds the patient that he or she is looking for, then the entire high-resolution image will eventually be received.

These methods of image compression and progressive image transmission have certain niche applications where they could be marginally useful. Mainstream image compression standards are not likely to change anytime soon in order to accomodate these specialized situations, but there are purposes for which their implementation may well be worth the additional complexity.

Bill Overall / March 12, 1999